open access

Vol 75, No 4 (2017)
Original articles
Published online: 2016-12-27
Submitted: 2016-07-02
Accepted: 2016-11-15
Get Citation

The relationship of socioeconomic status with coronary artery calcification and pericardial fat

Hussein Nafakhi, Abdulameer Almosawi, Hasan Alnafakh, Widad Mousa
DOI: 10.5603/KP.a2016.0187
·
Kardiol Pol 2017;75(4):368-375.

open access

Vol 75, No 4 (2017)
Original articles
Published online: 2016-12-27
Submitted: 2016-07-02
Accepted: 2016-11-15

Abstract

Background: Little data currently exist supporting the correlation of socioeconomic status (SES) to markers of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

Aim: The main aim was to investigate the relationship of SES measured by economic status and educational level with coronary artery calcification (CAC) and pericardial fat volume (PFV) assessed by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).

Methods: A total of 220 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease, who underwent 64-slice MDCT angiography for assessment of coronary atherosclerosis, were recruited between January 2014 and March 2015. Of these, 186 patients were enrolled in this cross sectional study.

Results: Low economic status patients showed higher PFV values; median (inter-quartile range [IQR] was 94 [50–140] cm3, p = 0.00001 and r = 0.37, compared to patients with high economic status, and this association persisted even after multiple logistic regression to conventional cardiac risk factors (p = 0.004, CI 7.3–30.4), while patients with low economic status reported a higher calcium score (but statistically non significant) (p = 0.12) compared to high economic status patients. Pa­tients with no formal education showed higher PFV (median [IQR] was 93 [48–140] cm3, p = 0.01) compared to patients with bachelor’s degree (median [IQR] was 56 [28–92] cm3), but this association was attenuated after further adjustment for conventional cardiac risk factors (p = 0.1, CI –9.52–10.88), while CAC showed no significant correlation with educational level (p = 0.2, r = 0.117).

Conclusions: Socioeconomic status, particularly economic status measure, reported a significant inverse relationship with PFV independent of conventional cardiac risk factors.

Abstract

Background: Little data currently exist supporting the correlation of socioeconomic status (SES) to markers of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

Aim: The main aim was to investigate the relationship of SES measured by economic status and educational level with coronary artery calcification (CAC) and pericardial fat volume (PFV) assessed by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).

Methods: A total of 220 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease, who underwent 64-slice MDCT angiography for assessment of coronary atherosclerosis, were recruited between January 2014 and March 2015. Of these, 186 patients were enrolled in this cross sectional study.

Results: Low economic status patients showed higher PFV values; median (inter-quartile range [IQR] was 94 [50–140] cm3, p = 0.00001 and r = 0.37, compared to patients with high economic status, and this association persisted even after multiple logistic regression to conventional cardiac risk factors (p = 0.004, CI 7.3–30.4), while patients with low economic status reported a higher calcium score (but statistically non significant) (p = 0.12) compared to high economic status patients. Pa­tients with no formal education showed higher PFV (median [IQR] was 93 [48–140] cm3, p = 0.01) compared to patients with bachelor’s degree (median [IQR] was 56 [28–92] cm3), but this association was attenuated after further adjustment for conventional cardiac risk factors (p = 0.1, CI –9.52–10.88), while CAC showed no significant correlation with educational level (p = 0.2, r = 0.117).

Conclusions: Socioeconomic status, particularly economic status measure, reported a significant inverse relationship with PFV independent of conventional cardiac risk factors.

Get Citation

Keywords

atherosclerosis, coronary artery, calcification, multi-detector computed tomography, pericardial fat, socioeconomic status

About this article
Title

The relationship of socioeconomic status with coronary artery calcification and pericardial fat

Journal

Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal)

Issue

Vol 75, No 4 (2017)

Pages

368-375

Published online

2016-12-27

DOI

10.5603/KP.a2016.0187

Bibliographic record

Kardiol Pol 2017;75(4):368-375.

Keywords

atherosclerosis
coronary artery
calcification
multi-detector computed tomography
pericardial fat
socioeconomic status

Authors

Hussein Nafakhi
Abdulameer Almosawi
Hasan Alnafakh
Widad Mousa

References (23)
  1. Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation. 1993; 88(4 Pt 1): 1973–1998.
  2. Kim D, Diez Roux AV, Kiefe CI, et al. Do neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and low social cohesion predict coronary calcification?: the CARDIA study. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 172(3): 288–298.
  3. Steptoe A, Hamer M, O'Donnell K, et al. Socioeconomic status and subclinical coronary disease in the Whitehall II epidemiological study. PLoS One. 2010; 5(1): e8874.
  4. Silverman MG, Blaha MJ, Krumholz HM, et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium on coronary heart disease events in individuals at the extremes of traditional risk factor burden: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(33): 2232–2241.
  5. Nafakhi H, Al-Nafakh HA, Al-Mosawi AA, et al. Correlations between aortic root calcification and coronary artery atherosclerotic markers assessed using multidetector computed tomography. Acad Radiol. 2015; 22(3): 357–362.
  6. Iozzo P. Myocardial, perivascular, and epicardial fat. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34 Suppl 2: S371–S379.
  7. Nafakhi H, Al-Mosawi A, Al-Nafakh H, et al. Association of pericardial fat volume with coronary atherosclerotic disease assessed by CT angiography. Br J Radiol. 2014; 87(1038): 20130713.
  8. Strike PC, Steptoe A. Psychosocial factors in the development of coronary artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2004; 46(4): 337–347.
  9. Cooper DC, Milic MS, Mills PJ, et al. Endothelial function: the impact of objective and subjective socioeconomic status on flow-mediated dilation. Ann Behav Med. 2010; 39(3): 222–231.
  10. Laaksonen M, Talala K, Martelin T, et al. Health behaviours as explanations for educational level differences in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a follow-up of 60 000 men and women over 23 years. Eur J Public Health. 2008; 18(1): 38–43.
  11. Loucks EB, Sullivan LM, Hayes LJ, et al. Association of educational level with inflammatory markers in the Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163(7): 622–628.
  12. Tamarappoo B, Dey D, Shmilovich H, et al. Increased pericardial fat volume measured from noncontrast CT predicts myocardial ischemia by SPECT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3(11): 1104–1112.
  13. Mazurek T. [Proinflammatory capacity of adipose tissue--a new insights in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis]. Kardiol Pol. 2009; 67(10): 1119–1124.
  14. Mazurek T, Kochman J, Kobylecka M, et al. Inflammatory activity of pericoronary adipose tissue may affect plaque composition in patients with acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation: preliminary results. Kardiol Pol. 2014; 72(5): 410–416.
  15. Davidovich D, Gastaldelli A, Sicari R. Imaging cardiac fat. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 14(7): 625–630.
  16. Owen N, Poulton T, Hay FC, et al. Socioeconomic status, C-reactive protein, immune factors, and responses to acute mental stress. Brain Behav Immun. 2003; 17(4): 286–295.
  17. Rajsheker S, Manka D, Blomkalns AL, et al. Crosstalk between perivascular adipose tissue and blood vessels. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010; 10(2): 191–196.
  18. Mazurek T, Zhang L, Zalewski A, et al. Human epicardial adipose tissue is a source of inflammatory mediators. Circulation. 2003; 108(20): 2460–2466.
  19. Muntaner C, Eaton WW, Miech R, et al. Socioeconomic position and major mental disorders. Epidemiol Rev. 2004; 26: 53–62.
  20. Albert MA, Glynn RJ, Buring J, et al. Impact of traditional and novel risk factors on the relationship between socioeconomic status and incident cardiovascular events. Circulation. 2006; 114(24): 2619–2626.
  21. Colhoun HM, Rubens MB, Underwood SR, et al. Cross sectional study of differences in coronary artery calcification by socioeconomic status. BMJ. 2000; 321(7271): 1262–1263.
  22. Mols RE, Sand NP, Jensen JM, et al. Social factors and coping status in asymptomatic middle-aged Danes: association to coronary artery calcification. Scand J Public Health. 2013; 41(7): 737–743.
  23. Diez Roux AV, Detrano R, Jackson S, et al. Acculturation and socioeconomic position as predictors of coronary calcification in a multiethnic sample. Circulation. 2005; 112(11): 1557–1565.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., Świętokrzyska 73 street, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl