open access

Vol 69, No 8 (2011)
Original articles
Published online: 2011-08-17
Submitted: 2012-12-28
Get Citation

Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST−elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial

Piotr Chodór, Tomasz Kurek, Anetta Kowalczuk, Marcin Świerad, Tomasz Wąs, Grzegorz Honisz, Andrzej Świątkowski, Witold Streb, Zbigniew Kalarus
Kardiol Pol 2011;69(8):763-771.

open access

Vol 69, No 8 (2011)
Original articles
Published online: 2011-08-17
Submitted: 2012-12-28

Abstract

Background: Compared to the transfemoral approach (TFA), the transradial approach (TRA) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with less risk of access site complications, greater patient comfort and faster mobilisation. Using vascular closure devices during TFA can offer similar advantages.
Aim: To compare the results of TRA and TFA using a StarClose device for primary PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods: Patients were randomised to PCI using TRA (n = 49) or PCI using TFA and StarClose (n = 59).
Results: Door-to-balloon inflation time was 67.4 ± 17.1 vs 57.5 ± 17.5 min (p = 0.009) in the TRA and TFA groups respectively. Procedural success rate was 100% and 98.3%, respectively (NS). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or bleeding complications between the groups: 2.1% and 8.2% in the TRA group vs 1.7% and 10.2% in the TFA group (NS). Time to resume an upright position and time to full mobility was comparable in both groups.
Conclusions: The TRA for PCI in patients with STEMI is related to a significantly longer door to balloon time compared to the TFA. This had no influence on the incidence of MACE. The duration and efficacy of PCI were comparable in both groups. Using StarClose after PCI performed via the TFA resulted in an incidence of access site and bleeding complications comparable to that found when using TRA.
Kardiol Pol 2011; 69, 8: 763–771

Abstract

Background: Compared to the transfemoral approach (TFA), the transradial approach (TRA) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with less risk of access site complications, greater patient comfort and faster mobilisation. Using vascular closure devices during TFA can offer similar advantages.
Aim: To compare the results of TRA and TFA using a StarClose device for primary PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods: Patients were randomised to PCI using TRA (n = 49) or PCI using TFA and StarClose (n = 59).
Results: Door-to-balloon inflation time was 67.4 ± 17.1 vs 57.5 ± 17.5 min (p = 0.009) in the TRA and TFA groups respectively. Procedural success rate was 100% and 98.3%, respectively (NS). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or bleeding complications between the groups: 2.1% and 8.2% in the TRA group vs 1.7% and 10.2% in the TFA group (NS). Time to resume an upright position and time to full mobility was comparable in both groups.
Conclusions: The TRA for PCI in patients with STEMI is related to a significantly longer door to balloon time compared to the TFA. This had no influence on the incidence of MACE. The duration and efficacy of PCI were comparable in both groups. Using StarClose after PCI performed via the TFA resulted in an incidence of access site and bleeding complications comparable to that found when using TRA.
Kardiol Pol 2011; 69, 8: 763–771
Get Citation

Keywords

percutaneous coronary intervention; vascular closure device; STEMI; radial approach; femoral approach

About this article
Title

Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST−elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial

Journal

Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal)

Issue

Vol 69, No 8 (2011)

Pages

763-771

Published online

2011-08-17

Bibliographic record

Kardiol Pol 2011;69(8):763-771.

Keywords

percutaneous coronary intervention
vascular closure device
STEMI
radial approach
femoral approach

Authors

Piotr Chodór
Tomasz Kurek
Anetta Kowalczuk
Marcin Świerad
Tomasz Wąs
Grzegorz Honisz
Andrzej Świątkowski
Witold Streb
Zbigniew Kalarus

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., Świętokrzyska 73 street, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl